In this section, you will learn:
1. The YAR action research process
2. Facilitation and mentoring support required to be given by the practitioners to the youth
3. To facilitate the YAR inputting workshops in a participatory and youth-centric approach
4. General workshop design with country-specific variations
The YAR followed a process of facilitating the selected youth researchers to conduct the action research in their communities through intensive workshops and hands-on mentoring during the field research. The workshops were designed to provide inputs on research skills such as creating the research tools, data collection, data analysis, critical thinking, and documentation. Along with a skill component, the workshops also provided the space to develop other competencies such as leadership, initiative-taking, teamwork, creativity, and problem-solving. Along with the research input workshops, each partner conducted various and context-specific sessions to build the researchers' perspectives on gender, education, and social justice.
In this e Manual, we have created a replicable module for all the research input workshops, as well as some of the perspective building sessions. Each of the modules follows the general design we had in mind while designing the workshops, but in practice, the workshops had variations incorporated by the ASPBAE members. Notes about these variations have been added to the general modules.
The workshop follows the spirit of the YAR in its approach and pedagogy. As this is a youth-led action research, the workshop design also, reflects this commitment to youth leadership, and initiative. The workshops have been designed to be participatory, experiential and transformative. This means that:
To follow this youth-friendly approach of the workshops and facilitation, ASPBAE has identified certain non-negotiable dimensions. These are:
The workshop facilitation team plays different roles. Each role has its responsibilities and essential qualities and skills. Following is a table that gives more information about the various roles in a facilitation team. Please note that while a person can play more than one role, it would be virtually impossible for only one person to do everything. Hence, a team of facilitators is very important and needs to be groomed from the beginning.
Mobilisation and participant liaison
Subject knowledge experts
Documentation – photo, video, written
The following workshops are designed to train young researchers to conduct action research in their local communities. There are two types of workshops: a core set of workshops designed to build research skills, and a supplementary set designed to develop skills and perspectives in gender, education, and youth leadership.
The modules are written in a way that ensures they are easy to understand and replicate. Each module begins with a list of stated objectives or intentions of the workshop. There is also a section containing preparatory notes for facilitators. All workshops are divided into sessions that fulfil a particular objective of the workshop. Each session in the module will contain the following information:
Welcome the participants to the workshop by saying a few warm words of welcome. Many participants may have found it challenging even to come to the workshop (getting a leave, reluctant parents, etc.) so talk about these and praise the participants' efforts to join in the action research process.
Conduct a small ice-breaker to make the participants comfortable and relaxed. Now, tell the participants that we are going to introduce ourselves to each other in a fun and interactive way. Each participant is given a blank name tag. Ask the participants to think of a positive adjective for themselves, which begins with the same letter as their name. The adjective can be in any language. Eg: Adventurous Anita, Compassionate Cecilia, Marvellous Maria. They have to write their names and adjectives on the name-tag and announce it to everyone else. They can also briefly say why they chose that particular adjective for themselves.Things to consider :
Some participants may take longer to warm up and may not participate fully in the beginning. For certain activities like this one, it is okay to give a gentle push to such a participant. For example, suggest a few adjectives they would like to use and engage in further dialogue about it. If the participant continues to be unwilling, let them be. Do not insist on their participation, or call other people's attention on them.
After the participants have introduced themselves, ask them to share what they think is the purpose of the workshop. Ask 2-3 participants to speak. Taking forward from there, write the words on the board and ask the participants if they have ever heard of research. Ask them questions such as:
1. When you think of research what is the first thing that comes to your mind?
2. Who usually does research?
3. Where does research usually take place?
Participants will usually answer that research is done in labs, by scientists, educated people, etc. Counter this with a statement, that according to you, everyone is constantly doing research. We are all researchers. Ask the participants, can you think of something you have 'researched' in your life? Research is finding information in a systematic way to a specific question. You may have researched colleges, courses, jobs, places to go, food, recipes, even people! Ask the participants to give examples of something they have 'researched'.
Now, tell the participants that this workshop is to develop our research skills so that we can do research and unearth new information from our communities and our lives. Further, this is not just research, it is action research, because we are not only going to discover information but also use it to bring about positive changes in our lives and community.
What kind of changes? This will be answered through an exercise.
Ask the participants to trace the outline of their hand on a piece of paper. This is a representation of themselves – each hand is as unique as each participant in the room! Ask the participants to look at each other's 'hands' and appreciate their differences as well as similarities. Draw your hand on a board or larger paper. Tell the participants that what looks like a hand is going to become something different. Now, draw a beak and an eye on the thumb and feet at the base of the hand. This transforms the hand into a bird in flight. Ask the participants to make their hand into a bird as well.
After all the participants have drawn their hand-bird, ask them to pin up their drawing on a notice board so that it looks like many birds are taking flight.
Discussion points :
Tell the participants that the hand to bird exercise is a metaphor for the self-transformation they will undergo during the workshop, and more generally in the action research. The workshop will enable them to gain a vision (eye), voice (beak), wings (confidence), and an understanding of the context (feet). Just by adding a few elements to the hand, it has the potential to become a bird. Yet the hand remains as it is. And so similarly, the participants will still be themselves, and yet gain some important tools to do and be so much more.
This exercise should help the participants become more grounded in the objectives of the workshop. It will help prepare and excite them for the next sessions.
In this exercise, the participants will deepen an understanding of their communities. Depending on the number of participants, make groups of 5-7 participants from the same community. Give them a chart-paper and ask them to discuss and write their responses to the following questions:
1. What are the special features of their community?
2. What factors in their community are nurturing/conducive to their (the participants') development?
3. What factors in their community are hindering their (the participants') development?
Ask the participants to draw a rough map of their communities showing the features they have mentioned (if possible) as well as the important landmarks.Discussion points:
After the participants have finished, ask each group to present their responses and map to the entire group. Encourage people in the audience to ask questions, dig for more information. Ask the presenting groups questions about why they feel a certain factor is hindering/nurturing.
After all the groups have presented, hang their chart-papers for everyone to see and ask the participants to glance at all the presentations once again. Do they see any commonalities? Is something repeated – especially among the nurturing/hindering factors? Does anything particular stand out?
Ask the participants why certain factors are common across different geographic/social/cultural communities. Do they think these are true for other communities too? Eg – would a hindering factor for a rural community apply to an urban area as well? Invite the participants to share their opinions.
Finally, address the question that many participants will have by now – why are some factors common across various communities? What are the real causes behind the hindrances that marginalised youth face in today's world? End the discussion by stating that this is just the beginning, but raising questions is important at the beginning of action research. Soon, the participants will endeavour to find the answers, but for now, it is very good that they have started asking questions and making connections.Expected outcomes:
This exercise should help the participants become more aware of their local context and analyse them in terms of how conducive it is to their development. It will also enable the youth participants to find common ground with each other and prepare them for a broader understanding of structures in the next session.
This is a psycho-emotive exercise that helps participants to understand the structural roots of the marginalisation and discrimination they may face in their lives. Before beginning the activity, tell the participants that this is a serious exercise that requires introspection and sharing. It may also cause people to feel emotional and vulnerable. Hence together we need to create a safe space for people to express themselves openly. Discuss the principles required to create a safe space with the participants. Some principles can be:
Ask the participants if they agree with all the principles. Each principle should be agreed upon and 'vowed' by all the participants and facilitators. Ask the participants if they would like to suggest any more rules for the space. Once all the principles are agreed upon, tell the participants that we have now officially 'sealed' the space as a safe one.
Following this, the participants will become more serious and focused on the next activities.
First, divide the participants into pairs, and ask them to pair up with someone they do not know well. Once the pairs are ready, ask them to sit back-to-back, looking away from one another but supporting each other with their backs. Tell them that the first part of this exercise is silent and requires only introspection. But since we are all together, it is important to support each other in non-verbal ways as well, which is why the partners.
Then, give each participant a piece of paper and a pen/pencil. Get them to think of their mothers or important mother-figures in their lives. How does she look? What would she be doing right now? Ask the participants to hold their mothers/mother figures in their thoughts. Then, ask them to write the following three things:
1. Mother's name
2. One quality you admire in her
3. One opportunity that you think she would have benefitted from, but which she couldn't access
After the participants have finished writing, ask each of them to stand up and read aloud the three things they have written about their mother.Discussion points:
As the participants begin talking about their mothers, a pattern will emerge, as many mothers' stories will be similar, especially the lack of opportunities in education, careers, and exercising personal agency. The participants should also begin noticing these patterns. If not, bring their attention to it by asking, what are some of the commonalities we noticed about our mothers' stories?
Some participants may get emotionally charged while talking about their mothers. Encourage them to continue talking and tell the group it is okay to cry and express difficult emotions as it is a form of catharsis.
As the participants are talking about the common aspects of their mothers' stories, make a list of these on the board. Continue the discussion by asking the following questions:
1. Why do you think there are so many commonalities?
2. Do these commonalities cut across geographic and socio-economic backgrounds as well?
3. Do these commonalities transcend age? Do you think the opportunities your mother was denied, are you (or your sister/friend) also denied?
4. Are such opportunities denied to women and girls only, or to men and boys as well?
5. What opportunities are denied to women and girls only? And why?
The participants will realise that many opportunities are only denied or restricted to women and girls. These restrictions are common to women and girls across different locations but are faced more severely by those who are also deprived financially or socially. Eg – women's education is not encouraged in various classes in society, but for families living on the brink of poverty, it is easier to invest in the education of their sons, as girls and women are not regarded as the family breadwinners. Hence, it is a combination of poverty, patriarchy (the belief that men/boys are superior to women/girls), and powerlessness that enmeshes the lives of all women and girls, resulting in restrictions upon their mobility and denial of opportunities for their growth and development.
At this, draw a triangle on the board and label its three points as Patriarchy, Poverty, and Powerlessness. Explain that this triangle of three 'P's together create a stronghold of restrictions, denials, discrimination, and violence over the girls' lives. Ask the participants to share instances and examples of how they think this 'Permuda' triangle operates in their lives. Encourage them to share stories from their lived experiences.
Finally, conclude the activity by thanking all the participants for having the courage to be vulnerable and share stories of hardships. But the important realisation is that these problems are not personal but rather social, affecting all of us. Hence, we need to come up with collective solutions to break the stronghold of this triangle. This is what we are going to endeavour to do, in this workshop, as well as throughout the action research. But the first step to challenge any stronghold of power is to become aware of it and understand it thoroughly.Expected outcomes:
This exercise should help the participants become aware of the social and structural roots of their problems. It will provide a broad understanding of gender oppression and its interlinked causes. It will also help them focus on the research objectives, one of which is more gender parity.
The session on understanding research is a series of smaller activities, discussions, and group work that can be customised as per the participant groups. The objective of this session is three-fold – the participants should understand the concept of action research, the steps involved in action research, and the ethics of action research.
The various activities and information to be provided are given below.
This activity aims to give the participants a simple but clear conceptual understanding of action research. To begin, distribute meta cards to the participants and ask them to write or draw anything that answers the question, 'What is action research?' After this, ask the participants to show and share their responses with the group.
After the participants have finished, explain to the participants that research is nothing but a systematic and disciplined search for new information or knowledge. However, we take this definition forward by asking, what kind of knowledge are we looking for? And who will undertake that search and unearth new knowledge? Action research believes that everyone has the right and the potential to become a researcher and create knowledge. It upholds that the most powerful form of research happens when it is done by the people upon themselves. Hence, young people are best equipped to research on youth. Or rural girls, even if they are still in school, or have dropped out, are still the best people to research and create knowledge on rural girls. No research expert can match the expertise that comes from actual lived experience. Hence, action research believes that the researcher and the researched should be the same.Discussion points:
The following points will help to explain and clarify the concept and principles of action research.
Features of action research:
Principles of action research:
Since research is a systematic process of inquiry, there are designated steps in its process. Knowledge of these steps is a must for any researcher. This activity suggests a fun way to provide information about these steps to the youth participants.
To begin with, tell the participants that they are going to play a game of treasure hunt where the participants, divided into groups, hunt for a series of clues that lead them to a treasure. The team that reaches the treasure first, wins it. The treasure can be a basket of small gifts, but make sure in the end all the participants get some gifts. After the exercise, ask the participants to list down the steps needed to find the treasure. Usually, (ADD COMMA) the participants will say that they were given the first clue, which they decoded, and which led to the next clue. This went on until they found the treasure.Discussion points:
Explain that action research follows a similar pattern of steps. We begin by identifying the research objective – the goal or 'treasure' of the research. But we don't know how to reach it! Hence, we need 'clues' or tools that will take us to our objective. These tools or 'research methods' are systematic and follow one another – not unlike the clues in a treasure hunt! You will not reach the treasure unless you systematically follow the clues.
Further, just as each clue requires you to take a particular action to move to the next one, in action research, the knowledge you unearth might also push you to take some action. This action can lead to further information, or the 'treasure' – the purported objective of your research!
For further clarity, these are the steps of action research:
1. Identifying the problem – generating the research question and research objective. Usually in action research, the objective is not limited to finding information or knowledge, it can also lead to concrete change or solution to the problem identified)
2. Finalising the methodology – creating the tools to collect data and analyse it
3. Collecting data – using the tools generated to collect information from the field
4. Assimilating and analysing the data – compiling the data, organising and cleaning it, and looking for meaning using critical thinking and dialogue
5. Taking actions – based on the data, taking individual or collective actions which will lead to a solution to the problem identified
6. Writing a report – documenting the research, writing the analyses, and drafting recommendations
7. More data collection or actions, if needed
8. Dissemination of findings – taking the research to various audiences and stakeholders, submitting demands and recommendations
In this activity, the participants are introduced to the ethics of doing research. This is a presentation-based activity; hence it might become lecture-like for some participants. If this happens, after explaining the ethics, organise the participants to enact small role-play by giving them situations in which they will need to go by a particular research ethic. Example situations are given below.
Ethics of action research:
Example situations for role play:
In this activity, the participants have to do an actual research as practice. Divide the participants into small groups (of not more than 4) and ask them to choose a topic on which they would like to conduct a small research study. The 'field' of the research should be limited to the campus only. But for example, they can research the lives of those who work on the campus, or the organisation (and the facilitators), or even on each other. Once they choose their topic, ask them what kind of research methods they will use.
The participants should design their questionnaires or any other data collection tools. After they have collected data, ask them to summarise the data and present it in chart-papers.Discussion points:
In the plenary, ask each group to present their research process and findings. Ask them to highlight the steps of this process, as well as the ethics they followed. Encourage other participants to also ask questions.Expected outcomes:
This exercise should help familiarise participants to the data collection process and make them comfortable and motivated to do research. It will also give the facilitation team a picture of how well the participants have understood the concept and process of action research and surface any doubts or questions in the participants' minds.
In the final session of the workshop, the participants and the facilitation team have to co-create data collection tools for the action research. A number of data collection tools should be pre-selected by the facilitation team. In the YAR, the following tools were used by the girls and young women researchers to collect data:
1. Detailed map of their village, hand-drawn by the girls, which indicated the village boundaries, roads and field, mark resources and facilities and showed the geographic distribution of various communities living in the village.
2. Census of girls aged 15 to 25 in their community. The census collected preliminary demographic data from 100 girls in each village.
3. In-depth survey with a sample of minimum 25 girls. The survey focussed on girls' experiences of and issues with the formal education system, as well as their learning aspirations, status at home, and menstrual health issues.
Explain to the participants that we have now arrived at the final leg of the workshop. Now, it is the participants who have to do most of the work. Motivate them to put all their energy into this research, as it is now theirs. Once all the participants express their enthusiasm, move to the next section.
Take the participants through the topic of the research as well as the research questions and objectives. Then explain to them that they must collect data about this topic from their local communities. This can be done in different ways, using various tools. Here, explains each data collection tool to them, and ask them what could be the best tool for their data collection.
When the tools have been agreed upon, ask the participants to design the tools. Eg. If the survey method is to be used, then ask the participants to make a list of questions which can be asked in the survey, and which will help us collect data that corresponds to our research questions. Divide the participants into groups (of 5-8 each) and ask each group to work on designing a different data collection tool. Each group has to then present their tool to the other groups and justify why a particular question is being asked.
Ask the workshop documentator to collect all the draft tools from the groups. After the workshop, the facilitation team should review the tools and use them to create a final set of data collection tools.Facilitation notes:
If possible, use the questionnaires or the tools generated by the participants to conduct a mock survey/interview. Ask a volunteer from the participants to conduct an interview with another participant using the tools generated. This will give the participants an idea of how to go about the fieldwork in their communities and familiarise them to questions they will ask in the actual data collection process. It will also help fine tune questions which are difficult to ask or comprehend.Expected outcomes:
This exercise should result in the first draft of the data collection tools such as questionnaires, interview guidelines, and survey forms. This will help familiarise participants to the data collection tools and the questions they will ask in the research.
The second workshop on action research focuses on collation and analysis of the data collected by the youth researchers. At the end of the workshop, the participants will be able to:
1. Reflect on the lessons learned in data collection
2. Review the integrity of the methods employed and whether ethics have been followed, and therefore ascertain whether the data gathered can be used
3. Tabulate the data into mastersheets and draw frequency tables and charts for further analysis
4. Generate first-level analysis and cross tabulation
5. Develop critical thinking skills and employ them in the data and map analysis
6. Analyse their maps through gender and social justice lenses
7. Identify and plan actions to take the action research forward
Welcome the participants to the workshop and ask them how they feel to be back in the learning space. Once a few participants have spoken, ask them if they are aware of the purpose of this particular workshop. Let a few participants respond before sharing the workshop objectives. The workshop will help the participants develop their analytical skills and enable them to meaningfully use the data they have collected. Data analysis will help in consolidating findings and building evidence for further actions and advocacy. Ask the participants to voice their doubts and questions about the purpose of the workshop.
At this stage, re-introduce the principles of the learning space to the participants and get them to discuss and agree to all the principles, or suggest any new ones. Some principles can be:
Most of the participants should know each other since this is the second workshop. However, it's a good idea to do introductions as it will help the participants refamiliarize with one another, and in case there are any new additions. Introductions can be done with the help of a game, which will break the ice between the participants and make them more comfortable in the group. Given here are two introduction games, but different ones can be used as well.
Ask the participants to form a circle. Each participant has to take a step into the circle and shout out her/his name, along with an action, eg. a jump, a dance move. Once the participant finishes, the remaining participants repeat her/his name and action. Every participant in the circle gets a chance to do this.
Ask the participants to form a circle. Tell the participants, we are going to play a memory game. Begin by telling them your name. Now, ask the person on your left to continue. For this, she has to say your name as well as her own. Each subsequent person has to say the names of all the people before her, in the correct order. Anyone who misses or gets it wrong gets a 'punishment' and has to perform something for the audience.
Once the participants are familiarised and comfortable, invite them to reflect over their experiences of fieldwork and data collection. For this, divide the participants into small groups of 4 to 5. Groups can be random or according to location. Once the participants are seated in their groups, ask them to recollect the tasks they were given in the first workshop. These tasks were meant to be carried out in their local communities.
The tasks were:
1. Mapping the village (group work)
2. Census of girls (aged 14-25) in the village (group work)
a. Census form
3. In-depth survey of girls about their educational status and education needs for livelihood and life-skills (individually)
a. Survey questionnaire
Ask the participants to raise their hands if they have completed all these tasks. Congratulate the participants on completing the data collection.
Further, explain to them that the work they have done so far is called 'field work' or 'data collection' in research. It involves going to the field of the research, in this case, the local communities of the participants, and collecting data through various tools.
Now, ask the participants to discuss the following questions in their small groups, and based on their discussion, make a presentation that will be shared in front of the other groups.
1. What was your overall experience of the fieldwork?
2. During the fieldwork, what processes were easy and what was challenging?
3. How did you overcome the challenges?
4. How was the experience of working together as youth researchers?
After all the groups have presented, ask the participants to voice out the common aspects of their experiences on the field, which emerged in the discussions. The common experiences that emerged during the YAR are given in the table below. Discussion points for facilitators are given in the next column.
|Participants' experiences||Facilitators' points|
|The creation of a new identity as 'researchers' for the youth. Girls, especially, who were earlier invisible and unacknowledged were now recognised in the village as leaders and change-makers.||Congratulate the participants for creating a new identity for themselves. This new identity challenges the traditional prescriptions of women as silent, meek, receptors of knowledge.|
|Discomfort around questions related to sexuality and menstruation.||This reflects our collective anxieties around women's sexuality. Why is this anxiety only around girls and not boys? It thrives due to patriarchal and sexist norms around marriage, especially the belief that women and girls are property that 'belong' to the men in their lives. If women start behaving according to their desires, they don't remain the meek, obedient objects that patriarchy expects them to be. That is why it is looked down upon, or feared for.|
|The voices and needs of the youth were brought to light through the research.||The YAR is a platform for youth to build rooted knowledge about their own experiences, opinions, and aspirations. This will help in recognising young people are a special group with their own needs and challenges, as well as take their voices to different audiences.|
|Through the research, the girls have also learned and demonstrated life skills such as effective communication skills, problem solving, how to convince people, etc.||It was important to speak to people who were different from us as it allowed us to look at the world through different lenses and broaden our thinking.|
|Difficulties and challenging to convince parents, family, and community members who are skeptical about the action research.||Acknowledge that doing anything new or unconventional is difficult and requires courage or 'valour'. But if we want to see the changes we have envisioned, then we must persevere. The process of change is slow, and requires steady, constant effort and stepping out of one's comfort zone.
Even being assertive with our parents and negotiating with them to participate in the action research is an act of courage.
Asked the participants to reflect on what happens when we show courage and take risks, especially in our own lives. Usually, there will be some opposition, which is what scares us. The threat of retaliation and backlash is what frightens us but not the act of courage itself.
Explain to the participants that we are now going to begin the data analysis. But before the actual analysis takes place, we need to organise the data. This requires the following steps:
1. Checking the survey responses and eliminating incomplete responses
2. Coding the survey forms (in the YAR, an alphanumeric system was used to code forms corresponding to different communities, E.g. A1, A2… B1, B2, etc)
Ask the participants to complete the two steps in their community groups. The group facilitators can help the participants.
Once the responses have been coded, explain to the participants that these responses need to be compiled or put together into one sheet, so that they are easy to understand, and we can draw conclusions from reading them together. For example, each response tells us the story of one individual. But if we were to put all these responses together, then we have information that is representative of a larger population, say the youth of our community.
At this point, introduce the master sheets and explain how the master sheets have a table in which the data from the survey responses can be filled in. Ask the participants to check if the columns in the master sheet match the questions in the survey forms. Once the participants are familiarised with to the master sheets, ask them to fill the master sheets using the survey responses. Ask the group facilitators to help the participants and oversee the process, to make sure human errors are kept to the minimum.
Note about compilation:
If the data in the survey is quantitative, it can be given codes. For example, if a question in the survey is about the marital status of the respondent, then the potential responses can be:
Never married, Engaged, Civil partner, Married, Divorced, Separated, Widowed, Other. Each of these responses can be assigned a code, such as:
While filling the master sheets, only the code corresponding to the response should be written. This will help make the compilation process simpler and less time-consuming.
After the participants have finished filling in the master sheets, congratulate them for completing a rather tedious process of data analysis. Usually, this task is given to professional researchers or done with the help of computers, but the participants have undertaken it themselves and done it so meticulously – which is in itself a huge achievement.
Once the data has been compiled, the next step is to calculate the number of responses. This gives us an idea of the trends in the research field. For example, if the survey is on education, calculating the number of responses to the question "Do you go to school/college?" will give us an idea of how many / what proportion of youth are enrolled in formal education.
Using the school question as an example, ask the participants to think about how they will calculate the number and proportion of youth that are school-going as well as those who are out of school, from the master sheet. Invite each group to come up with their own 'solution' to this question. Most groups will usually end up making a table like this:
|Education status||Number of youth|
Most of the participants will have manually calculated the number of responses in each category. However, teach them to make frequency markers while counting as this will help make the calculation more accurate and avoid the chances of an error.
Explain to the participants that these are called 'frequency tables' as they show the frequency of responses for each question in our data. Once the participants understand the process of making frequency tables, ask them to make such tables for all the questions in the survey.
Ask the participants what they can deduce about the education status of youth in their community from the frequency table on education status. What kind of a picture does it paint? Participants will answer that more youth in their community have dropped out from formal education than those who are in school. This is a dismal picture, as it means that either youth are not able to access education opportunities, or that they do not see education as a priority due to underlying factors such as poverty, discrimination, etc. Ask the participants to think about and write down such 'notes' for each table, answering the following questions:
1. What can you deduce about youth in your community based on this table?
2. What does this deduction tell you about the youth in your community?
3. What further questions come to your mind after looking at this table?
As the frequency tables only have numbers, ask the participants if numbers or frequencies are enough while talking about the trends or the big picture. Explain to the participants that it is easier to understand the proportion of youth to the total instead of using whole numbers. For example, instead of saying 25 out of 50 youth are unmarried, it is easier to say, half of the youth are unmarried. But how do you calculate the proportions? Ask the participants if they know any methods.
The best method to calculate proportional frequencies in data is through percentage. This is because, in percentage, all the data is standardised to 100. That is, 100 is used as a base and the frequency of data is calculated in proportion to 100. This makes it easier to understand and compare with different data. When we use percentages, we can compare the data from our community to bigger data – even national and international averages. For example, using the earlier frequency table on education status, if we were to calculate the percentage, it would look like this:
|Education status||Number of youth||In percent|
This would tell us that 64% of our community youth do not go to school or college. We can compare this data with other data – we can find out the national and international figures and check how the youth in our community fare against national and international averages. If the total percent of out-of-school youth in the country is 45%, then it means that the youth in our community is worse off than the average youth in our country.
Once the participants have understood the concept of proportional representation in data and percentages, ask them to calculate the percentages for all the frequency tables.
If the participants are vulnerable or marginalised, a significant number of them will be out of school, or may not even possess the literacy and numeracy skills needed for such computation. However, that does not mean they be excluded from the process. Rather, more individual attention should be given to such participants so that they pick up the skills of numeracy and computation.
Many participants will also be new to calculations of this kind and unfamiliar to calculators, resulting in hesitancy and/or reluctance to participate in the process. However, in such situations, allay their fears by explaining to them that calculators are just like mobile phones, electronic tools used to compute numbers through various mathematical functions such as addition, subtraction, division, multiplication, and percentage. They are helpful tools in data analysis and hence there is nothing to be afraid of them. We needed to make friends with them and get over our fear. Ensure that all the participants get a chance to play with a calculator and do simple calculations on it. Encourage them to continue even after making a mistake.
Once they have finished calculating the percentages, ask the participants to think about how they can show their tabulations pictorially. Do not give them examples of bar graphs or pie charts, as many participants will have seen them before and will try to make diagrams according to them. However, some participants will also be creative enough to represent the data through other drawings – of trees of varying heights, flowers with different numbers of petals, and faces with various expressions. Encourage such creative expression by praising the drawings made by the participants. Ask the group facilitators to help represent the data frequencies accurately in the diagrams.
Once the participants have finished the tables as well as the graphs, ask them to display their work on the walls. Call the participants together for a 'gallery walk' – they can go around the halls and look at each other's tabulations and drawings.
Critical thinking is an important aspect of action research. Critical thinking is the opposite of regular, everyday thinking. It enables us to look at the world around us in a deliberate, systematic, and logical way and develop a deeper understanding of it. It further pushes us to question our own assumptions and become more reflective and evaluative when we process information. As action-researchers researching in our contexts, it is vital to employ critical thinking so that we can question, challenge, and change the world as we know it.
The following exercises help in orienting participants to the concept and process of critical thinking. However, it is important to note that critical thinking is a continuous process that cannot be taught in a day. It needs to be constantly reiterated throughout the research process – we need to 'tune' our thinking to be able to not take anything at face value, ask questions, seek new perspectives. Some notes at the end of the session give more information about ways we can think more critically.
This is an exercise that is designed to stimulate the critical thinking and analytical capacities of the participants. It can be based on any question or premise, e.g. ‘Parents/elders must use physical punishment as a way to discipline children.’ Ask the participants to divide themselves into two groups, those who agree and those who disagree with this statement. Each participant in the two groups gets a chance to voice their opinion. Each group has to convince the other group to change their mind. Individuals within the groups are free to move to the other group or form their group. Ultimately, the group with more numbers wins.
Sometimes, the groups may split into smaller groups within the Agree/Disagree positions. Encourage this by probing the participants to think of nuances within the two positions. For example, ask the participants in the 'Agree' group what they think about using physical punishment (beating/violence) on adults as well as children, for the sake of discipline. Those who think violence should be used on adults can form another group from those who think it should only be used on children.
After 15 minutes, end the debate and ask the participants to sit in a circle together for the plenary.
Ask the participants to talk about their feelings during the debate and share their reflections. Specifically address those who changed their groups – why did they do so? After the participants have shared their reflections, summarise the debate by making the following points:
Ways to think more critically:
After explaining the concept of critical thinking to the participants, ask them to sit in small groups according to the month they are born in (Jan-April, May-August, September-December) and ask them to discuss the following questions:
Each group, after 10 minutes of discussion, comes to the front and presents their responses to everyone.
Show the following photograph to the participants:
Photo 1: Visibly impoverished girl and boy looking through a wire fence, at a group of uniformed, well-dressed students in a school ground.
Invite the participants to think about what the photograph is trying to convey. Participants will usually talk about the differences between the poor kids and the school kids. One big difference is which side of the fence they are on. After a few participants have spoken, ask them to reflect on another question:
What if the fence was not there, would there still be a difference between the two groups of kids?
Further, enquire if the participants think there are other such 'fences' or boundaries in our society that divide people and create hierarchies. What are some of these fences?
After talking about the various 'fences' or divisions in society, continue the discussion by asking the participants if they think these differences are natural or man-made. And if they are man-made, can we not un-make them? Is it possible to envision a society with no divisions or fences? How will that society look like? Ask a few participants to share their vision of an egalitarian society.
Also talk about how, just by looking at a single photograph, you can learn about social divisions and hierarchies. In this way, everything around us has another layer, a deeper meaning than what is seen on the surface. If we use the lens of critical thinking, if we ask the right questions, we can unearth this layer of meaning. And that is the first step towards the change that we want to see, towards the society that we have envisioned.
Taking forward this new lens of critical thinking, invite the participants to put it into practice by critically analysing the maps they have created of their communities. Connect the map analysis to the earlier exercise of photo analysis and ask the participant groups to present their maps in the following way:
Give 10 minutes to each group to re-look at their maps and write a small analytical note for their presentation. Afterwards, when each group presents, encourage the others to ask questions to the presenting group based on their notes.
After all the groups have presented, ask them to discuss the common features in all the community maps. Which particular social issue do they highlight? Is this issue also visible in the data that we have collected through other research methods?
Invite the participants to the final step of data analysis.
Now that the participants have finished a preliminary analysis of data and gained skills of critical thinking and analysis, invite them to an in-depth exercise of data analysis. We need to dig deeper into the data we have collected and organised, and bring out the truth it is trying to tell us! Sometimes, this truth leads us to more questions, which in turn propagates more research!
Explain the final step of data analysis to the participants. In this step, we review the collected data through a critical lens, and try to understand its meaning according to the objectives of our action research. In this process, critical thinking is our 'third eye' that enables us to ask two very important questions:
WHY: Why is something the way it is? and
WHY NOT: what is it that cannot be seen, but needs to be there?
Ask the participants to review their frequency tables, diagrams, explanations, and map analyses. Explain to the participants that this data has come from many sources – census, survey, village mapping, and the participants’ experiences and thinking. Depending on the thematic focus of the action research, ask the participants to write small 'essays' on different themes, citing the data collected as well as their own lived experiences. For example, if the themes in the action research are access to education, livelihood aspirations, survival struggles, and individual empowerment, then ask the participants to write an essay about each theme. The group of participants should discuss and write the essay together. Group facilitators can help in this process.
Some guide questions which can be used to stimulate the writing process are:
Once the participants have finished writing their analytical essays, ask each group to read out one essay, which can be discussed in the big group. Focus on the actions, and discuss how participants can take actions at the individual and community levels.
In some cases, the participants or facilitators will realise that the data collected is not enough to fulfil the objectives of the research, or that the findings from the data require additional data to support it. In action research, this is completely acceptable, even encouraged. If this happens, discuss with the participants and plan a further round of data collection.
As a conclusion, everyone has to agree upon 2 individual and 2 community actions. Create a plan of action as well as deadlines for the proposed actions.
For the concluding session, ask the participants to recap everything they have done in the workshop. Prompt the participants if they forget anything. The participants should recount the following:
Congratulate the participants on putting their efforts and hard work into a successful data analysis, and that it was due to their perseverance that we were able to complete the analysis in a short duration of time. Further, ask the participants to share their experiences of the workshop, focussing on new skills or knowledge that they have acquired over its duration.
Finally, remind the participants to undertake the proposed actions in their communities once they go back.
This workshop is of a shorter duration than the other core workshops. It can be one or two days long. In this workshop, the participants are expected to document their experiences of the action research and summarize the key findings of the action research in the style of a research report. The format of the report is given below. Notes are provided in each section for facilitators to guide the participants in the writing process.
- Need to be written by the organisation2. Who are we? Profile of the participants
- Ask the participants to think of creative ways to write this. They can draw caricatures, write poems for each other, or introduce themselves using funny memes3. Our group – How did we come together? What is the spirit of our group? What is our identity in the village?
- Ask the participants to write about what is special about their group. How do they work together? How do they help each other out? Do people recognize them as a 'researcher group' in the community?4. Our community
- Ask the participants to write about their communities. How do they see their community? What are its special features? Give them notes from the 'Community context' session in the first workshop5. Joining the YAR
How did the participants get introduced to the YAR? What motivated them to join it? What's the story behind it? Ask the participants to discuss and write
1. Coming together - Orientation meeting in the community
- Ask the participants to reflect on what happened in the orientation meetings in community. What were their initial reactions when they heard about the action research? Did they feel excited or nervous? Did they think they could do it?
2. Learning together - Workshop on introduction to research
- How did they participate in the first workshop? What was the first workshop about? What new things did they learn in this workshop? What was unexpected/ shocking? Did they have to get out of their comfort zone?
- Share the first workshop's photos and documentation with the participants to stimulate their memories
3. Action research methods
- What tools did the participants design for the YAR? Why did they choose these tools?
4. Research work in the field
- How did the participants carry out the data collection? What was the sample size? How did they use the research tools?
- Was it easy or difficult? How did they overcome the challenges? What did they learn in the process? Each participant can share one learning experience or challenge they overcame.
5. Community map
- Ask the participants to write about the process of drawing the community map, the learnings and challenges
6. Any actions taken while collecting data?
- Did any spontaneous actions emerge during the data collection? Write about those
7. Modules on gender, leadership, theatre, etc.
- Ask the participants to write about their experiences in the modules. What was the content? What were some new concepts or skills they learned? Did they have any striking realizations in this workshop? How did the participants connect the content of these modules to their lives? What was the most memorable moment in the modules? Have these modules inspired them to change any aspect of their personal lives?
- Share photos and documentation with the participants to stimulate their memories
8. Workshop on analysis
- What was the purpose of the data analysis workshop? What was the content of the workshop? What was the participants' reaction to seeing the data? How did they find the process of data compilation and counting, of using calculators for the first time? What were the new learnings and perspectives they gained? What were the major challenges during the workshop? Which data shocked/surprised you?
- Share the second workshop's photos and documentation with the participants to stimulate their memories
1. Analysis of data
- Ask the participants to edit and improve their theme-wise analysis written in the data analysis workshop
- Add the frequency tables and graphs which the participants feel are important
2. Key findings and major issues
- Ask the participants to draw key findings from the data analysis, as well as the major issues they have identified. These can be based on findings as well as lived experiences
3. Analysis of Map
- Ask the participants to edit and improve their map analysis written in the data analysis workshop
1. Theme wise recommendations
- Ask the participants to make a charter of recommendations. These need to be specifically addressed to various stakeholders with clearly specified demands.
Actions (Ongoing and upcoming) - Ask the participants to document any actions they have done in the course of the action research. These should be written like a story – what was the motivation behind this action? Did it emerge from the data? How did they plan and execute this action? Were there any challenges? How were the challenges overcome?
- What were three significant learnings for the participant group, from this action research?
- What were some of the major challenges? What didn't work? How did they overcome hurdles – individually as well as in a group?
- What was each participant's moment of change? Did the action research lead to any change in their identity in the community? Did it increase their participation in the community as well as in the family?
Participants can record their discussions and transcribe them later.
Women and girls are disenfranchised, discriminated against, and face violence in many aspects of their lives. Society treats women as inferior or secondary beings, the ramifications of which can be seen on a variety of social structures. Being a girl in today's world has become increasingly difficult, with rising cases of gender-based violence which creates an environment of fear and increased restrictions on the mobility of girls. In order to combat this structural devaluation and disenfranchisement of women, we need to first understand its root causes. In order to do this, we need a critical lens to look at our society, our own lives, in order to examine the structural undercurrents that shape our worlds. We need to question our assumptions, challenge accepted norms, and even rethink our understanding of 'normal'. Along with developing an understanding of patriarchy and how it operates in our lives, we also need to develop and share strategies we can use to challenge and combat it.
This module meant to introduce the concepts of gender and patriarchy to the participants, understand how patriarchy operates through various institutions in society leading to disenfranchisement of women and girls, understand the patriarchal nature of violence against women and girls, and finally equip them with the skills to effectively negotiate with and challenge these manifestations of patriarchy in their lives.
By the end of this module, participants will be able to:
Sociogram is an ice-breaker which aims to visually map differences within a group. This activity is fun to do and makes the participants think and take a stand on questions posed to them. To begin, create a list of questions to ask the group. These may range from personal likes and dislikes, beliefs, family information, along with questions related to gender. Some example questions are:
1. How many of you like dancing?
2. How many of you are pursuing a hobby apart from study?
3. How many want to study beyond graduation?
4. How many can cook?
5. In how many people's homes the men in the family do housework?
6. How many of you can drive a motorbike?
7. How many do fasts?
8. How many have working mothers?
9. How many can wear the clothes they want?
10. How many roam about alone after dark?
Every time a question is asked, the participants have to take a step forward if their answer is yes. Then the numbers of 'yes' and 'no' can be counted. Then write the question along with the number of participants saying yes and no, thus mapping how majority of people think and behave. This activity also helps to break the monotony and have some fun with the participants. In this module, the Sociogram activity can be focused on gender differences.
The Sociogram activity is also helpful in illustrating social and individual differences among a group, emphasizing the message that we are all different as much as we are similar. The next activities will help us understand one particular difference, the difference between men and women.
When a baby is born, the question everyone asks is, "Is it a boy or a girl?" From then onwards, this identity of boy or girl, man or woman, becomes fixed upon us and we continue to carry it throughout our lives. But what is this difference between boys and girls, men and women? How do we understand who is a man and who is a woman? Let us see through this activity:
On a chart paper, make two columns with the headings 'Men' and 'Women'. Begin the activity by asking participants the following question:
What do you think are the differences between men and women?
Encourage the group to respond to the question by coming up with as many differences as possible. The differences can be classified as –
1. Differences in looks (How do they look?)
2. Differences in behavior (How do they act?)
3. Differences in work (What do they do?)
Write the differences on the chart paper. If the characteristics of breastfeeding, giving birth to children do not get mentioned, probe further and ensure that they get noted down in the Women column. Similarly, try to get the group to mention the biological characteristics in men, such as having a beard/ moustache.
After the qualities of 'men' and 'women' have been noted, switch the Men and Women headings at the top of the columns, so that the qualities of men and women are now reversed. Review these and ask the participants whether it would be possible for each word to belong under the new label of Men or Women. For example, even though women are associated with sewing, can men learn to sew? Of course they can! However, certain things will be impossible to do/be for men or women. Ask the participants to cross out such instances. For example, giving birth is impossible for men.
Explain these impossible differences as 'natural/biological differences' or sex. The rest of the differences which can be 'learned' by both men and women are gender or 'socially-made differences'. Use examples to explain that such differences are cultural and may be different in different cultures or at different points in time. The difference between sex and gender can be further explained as:
|Sex is…||Gender is…|
Learned during socialization (growing up)
Does not vary across time or culture
Variations across historic periods/geographic/cultural locations
Decided by chromosomes, organs, hormones
Decided by social and cultural norms of masculinity and femininity
Fixed. Cannot easily be changed
An identity. We can decide for ourselves!
To further explore the socially created differences between men and women, let us look at the work men do, and the work women do. Divide the participants into two groups. One group is assigned men and the other women. Each group makes a list of all the work done by men or women throughout the day, along with the hours spent in doing that work. This can be based on their experiences and observations in their communities. There may be some variation in case the participants come from culturally very different communities. Encourage discussion among them and suggest they make two or more lists which reflect the various work done by men/women in their communities.
Ask all the groups to present their lists. Compare the hours… who spends more hours in work? Check if the participants have listed unpaid work that usually women are assigned. Usually, it will be that men's work is described in more detail then women's work. Further, talk about the differences in the work traditionally assigned to men and to women. The work assigned to women is tedious, constant, and lower status work. Work associated with power or new technology - sitting on a tractor, for example - is reserved for men. Provoke the participants to think about why women and women's work is devalued by society, while masculinity, masculine work and masculine symbols were valued and prized.
The two key points that need to be emphasized here are:
1. Gender is created by society. Hence it can be changed. But this change is slow and takes time. However, each successive new generation is 'tweaking' what it means to be a man or a woman in a particular culture at a particular time. So gender, ie the norms of masculinity and femininity are constantly changing. Examples – women's education
2. Gender is also hierarchical. Masculinity is accorded more value, hence more privileges. Example – men are ridiculed/shamed by being called feminine (why are you crying like a girl?) or given feminine attributes. Similarly, it is something of a status for a woman to be called a man – 'Mardani', 'sir'. Why is being a man (expressing masculinity) accorded higher status than being a woman (expressing femininity)? We shall explore this further in the next activity…
In this exercise, the participants are encouraged to reflect on their relationship with power through a game of pins and balloons. Divide the group into two, one group is given balloons while the other is given pins. The only instruction to give them is to make best use of the materials given to them. Tell them they have 10 minutes to do this. Once the game begins, usually those with the pins will begin running after the participants with the balloons with the intention of bursting their balloons.
Afterwards, ask the participants to reflect over their behaviour in the game. Both groups – the pins as well as the balloons, are asked to share their feelings. Some questions to prompt them can be:
Typically, the participants with the pins share that they felt victorious, proud of their 'achievements', even share the number of balloons they popped! The balloon group shares that they felt scared; also hurt when their balloons are pricked.
Then ask the participants to think about some more questions:
Discuss what prompted everyone to assume that the only way a pin and balloon could come together was in the act of bursting it! Ask the group with the pins if it wasn't their responsibility also to make use of the balloon. After all, the instructions were to make the best possible use of ALL items given to the participants! But the pins were used to destroy some items, not make use of them. Ask the participants to think of other ways in which pins and balloons could be used – such as to decorate the room, make a sculpture out of balloons joined together, etc.
Summarize the discussions with the following points:
Begin a PowerPoint presentation called the 'Patriarchy Tree'. Here the society is imagined as a tree whose root is the ideology of patriarchy. This creates a society which is hierarchical, which gives preference to those who are (or behave like) men and oppresses those who don't.
The branches of the tree are the various social institutions through which patriarchy operates to exert control over and oppress women. This control is further strengthened by the 'aerial roots' of the tree, which signify the various forms of control over women's bodies, mobility, sexuality, etc. Finally, the 'fruits' of the tree are the effects seen in society, which are violence, discrimination, and fear.
After explaining the patriarchy tree to the participants, divide them into small groups (comprising of 5 to 10 people). Allot each institution (marriage, family, religion, etc.) to one group and ask them to list out the various ways in which women are subjugated or discriminated against by patriarchy working through that particular social institution. These can be based on personal experiences or stories of friends/family members. After discussing these experiences, ask the participants to note them down on the 'leaves' (multicoloured papers cut in the shape of leaves) given to each group.
In the plenary, each group has to attach their leaves to an outline of the patriarchy tree and explain the ways in which patriarchy operates in that particular social institution. Following this, do a summarization with all the participants, asking them to reflect on their discussions and share insights or questions or new things they learnt from this session with the whole group.
Until now, we have tried to understand patriarchy and its scope, along with the depth it has penetrated in society. We have also seen how patriarchy is present in our personal and social spaces – from intimate relationships at home to institutions in the 'outside' world such as colleges, companies, public spaces. It is seen even in aspects of our lives that are beyond our everyday realities – governments, policies and laws, and the media also betray a patriarchal stance in their portrayal of or engagement with women. Like a tree, patriarchy has spread its branches across the social universe, while its roots have dug deep into our collective consciousness and hence affects most of our personal and social interactions.
Faced against such a widespread and resilient structure, how do we develop strategies to combat it? It is a daunting task, but something that we are all doing already, in different ways, in our own lives. Let us discuss these in more detail.
Ask the participants to sit in their previous groups and choose one problem from the ones they discussed earlier (in the patriarchy tree and leaves exercise). If they cannot come up with a problem, give them a situation corresponding to the social institution they are representing. Some sample situations are as follows:
After each group chooses one problem, ask the group do a role play they have to enact in front of the others. This role play will not only portray the problem, but also show strategies women and girls can use to overcome it. Let the groups come up with their own strategies, based on their personal experiences of dealing with such issues. After each role play, the strategy is discussed in the larger group, and if anyone from the audience has another strategy, invite them to come and perform it in the role play. In this way, we will learn many strategies to cope with daily issues of harassment, discrimination, restrictions, etc.
After starting the discussion on violence and power, ask the participants to share, in the big group or in small sub-groups, if they have faced violence of any kind just because they were women/girls.
Following this, discuss the different types of violence. Use the experiences shared by the participants as examples of different kinds of violence. Introduce physical, sexual, economic and emotional violence. The facilitator can also give more examples.
The next part of the session is to understand WHY violence takes place on girls and women. Start by asking the participants some questions:
This will usually show that girls/ women are the victims in the majority of cases of violence.
Explain that violence against women and girls is different from other forms of violence because:
A discussion on inequality (patriarchy causing it) being the root cause of violence and its many manifestations should follow, including the following points:
At the end of the exercise, discuss the following strategies to combat harassment and violence:
Ask the participants to do a 'harvesting' of their collective learning from the gender module. Each participant has toshare some new information they learned from the sessions.
After the participants have shared their learning, explain to them that challenging patriarchy needs a multi-pronged approach. Just as we discussed individual strategies of negotiating with or even challenging patriarchy in our personal lives, we also need to come together evolve strategies that challenge the structure of patriarchy at a wider social level.
Changing public mindsets is a very difficult and uphill task. It cannot be accomplished in a day, and cannot be done by one individual alone. But it needs to start from somewhere, so we can all take steps in our personal lives. We must also stand together in this, share our stories, start dialogues, build alliances, support each other in our struggles, and act as a collective force to improve the lives of girls and women everywhere.
The YAR is an important endeavor in this regard, as it provides evidence for advocacy, which is a way to make the government more accountable and responsive to take actions which stop gender based discrimination and violence, as well as actions that promote gender equality.
This module is comprised of games and interactive/reflective exercises that deepen the YAR participants' self-awareness, confidence, and foster team spirit.
Welcome the participants to the workshop and ask them if they are feeling comfortable in the training room. Once a few participants are spoken, request everyone to stand and form a circle. Tell them that the circle needs to be formed based on the hours of travel they had to commit to reaching the training venue. The circle can start with the person who took less time and can complete with the person who took the maximum time. Give 10 minutes for the participants to organize themselves in the circle. Let participants ask questions, instruct, and guide each other in the process. Once everyone is settled, ask each participant to share their name, where they come from, and how much time it took them to reach here. Despite all the challenges (getting permission from parents/teachers/employers, managing transport facilities, etc.) they managed to reach the venue on time. Appreciate everyone for their commitment to learning..
Things to consider:
Some participants may feel shy at first and take longer to participate. Give them more time, allow them to talk to their peers for consultation on time and transport (if they have come together) before sharing with the group. The prime purpose of the activity is cultivating open space for communication, comfort, and introductions.
Ask all participants to move into the middle of the room. Inform them that the objective of the game is to greet everyone in the room with our unique style. They can shake hands or can say Hello/Salaam/Namaste, allow them to use any appropriate greeting in their communities. Play music softly, ask participants to move around, and greet someone with a smile. Participants move around the room and ensure that they have greeted everyone. The game continues until everyone has greeted everyone else.
Sample music link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF7BkvLJwqg. Facilitators are encouraged to use local folk music or play local instruments in the training hall.
Another way of doing this activity:
When the greeting exercise is about to complete, stop the music and ask participants to freeze in that position. Request them to pair up with the nearest person, ask them to sit down and find out as much as they can about each other in 2 minutes. In plenary, each report back and introduce their new friend to the group
A Trust is an important aspect of any relationship. It helps one to open up, share and understand each at a deeper level. In a workshop setting too, trust needs to be developed so that participants feel comfortable to speak without being afraid of judgements of others. Strong trust leads to increased cohesiveness, reduces fear and boosts team spirit in the group.
Another way of doing this activity:
When the greeting exercise is about to complete, stop the music and ask participants to freeze in that position. Request them to pair up with the nearest person, ask them to sit down and find out as much as they can about each other in 2 minutes. In plenary, each report back and introduce their new friend to the group
Divide participants in small groups of four/five members. Inform them that the activity is designed to enhance group work and to build trust among peers. Give each group a few markers, blank papers, newspapers, tape, uncooked egg, and ask them to build a ‘safe’ nest for the egg. While building nest suggest groups to discuss elements which make nest strong, sustainable and nurturing. The facilitator may suggest each group discuss elements that will make the nest strong, sustainable, and nurturing. Remind participants that the nest and egg are a metaphor here for 'safe collective learning space', and the 'vulnerable self'. Ask each group to reflect upon the importance of safe spaces in their learning, and also to list down values and factors that make the nest stronger. Members can write those values on a small piece of paper and weave them together in the nest. Allow 30 minutes for this, after which request all the groups to bring their nests to the center of the training hall. At this point, the facilitator asks one member from each group to stand on a chair and drop the egg into the nest placed on the floor. In the plenary session each group shares their list with the other participants, the follow up discussion revolves around what makes safe space, and what they have learnt in the process.
Notes for facilitator:
Observe all the participants carefully, see if everyone is participating, is everyone able to share and contribute? Does someone need extra attention and support? If required, appoint volunteers for observation. Facilitator can pose following questions:
Divide participants into groups of five-six and ask them to decide a name for their team and/or choose a symbol for their group, draw it on card and stick to their shirt. Give each team an envelope of puzzle pieces, and ask them to divide pieces among themselves ensuring everyone has at-least one piece with them. Tell them that their task is to complete the whole puzzle and emphasize that ‘they will win when their team has all of its pieces in the right place’. Once they start, keep moving around and observe interesting patterns, discussions and actions.
In due course, teams will realize that some of the members have pieces which are irrelevant to their puzzle and they might feel confused and stuck. Encourage participants to keep trying and keep sharing the instructions that “You will win when your team has all of its pieces in the right place”. If they still did not understand, the facilitator might suggest them to move around silently and learn from their peers.
When all the puzzles are complete, congratulate all the teams and guide them
into plenary discussions, facilitator may use some of the questions:
During the initial discussion, facilitators must ensure that all the participants get enough time and trusted environment to share their feelings without being judged by others. Facilitators also need to record all the key messages and display them in the training room, encourage participants to ask more questions and allow some of the questions to be listed under ‘parking questions’ and remember to get back to them at the end of the sessions.
Towards the end of the discussion, participants can be asked to write their key insights which emerged from the activity and reflections on paper and then discuss in small groups. Two members can report back in the plenary or create posters which will be displayed as a gallery walk.
While concluding the activity facilitator synthesizes the learning and highlights the importance of participation, communication and trust in the team-work. S/he also emphasizes that the team excels when we look at larger goals, build-on the strengths of people and develop collaborations. Co-operation instead of competition supports people to grow in the long run.
Leadership Styles :
Invite the participants to stand in a circle, facing inwards. Place the three photographs on the floor, inside the circle. Ask the participants to have a close look at each of the photographs without picking them up. Once they have seen all the three, ask them to return to their place in the circle. Invite the participants to choose one photograph which appealed to them the most, from the three. Sub groups of uneven numbers are formed on the basis of their choice. Ask the three sub groups to sit with their chosen photograph and discuss among themselves using the following as guide questions:
Invite the sub groups to share their key points and caption.
Weaving the offerings of the sub groups, debrief the activity to highlight the styles of leadership represented by the three types of hands in the photographs. The photograph with one hand of the boxer is representative of aggressive style of leadership. However, also bring to notice that the hand gesture in the photo is that of a boxer’s punch, which is used to offend (attack) as well as defend (protect), based on the situation. In the second photograph, the two hands symbolise supportive leadership style. The child’s hand submits itself to the adult hand, allowing it to be held, supported and led. In the third photo, both the hands in a gesture of a hand shake, appear equal in size and strength, asserting confidence in each other. This symbolises the assertive style of leadership. Underscore the point in the discussion that these leadership styles are to be viewed appropriate to the context i.e. they are contextual and are not to be understood as one being better than the other. Invite them to share experiences to illustrate this fact.